[SDBUG] bandwidth withdrawls
jkitzman at vayusphere.com
Tue Jan 30 08:26:52 PST 2001
I completely forgot to mention.. I'd glady take cable over DSL anyday,
especially in the Mira Mesa area, but cable is sorta out of the question
because my complex is using that pacific bell satellite television stuff,
along with their regular analog telephone service.. so they never actually
ran cable =( .. I suppose this is good for them as a reseller, but bad for
me as a *gasp* end user *gasp*.
I apologize for the confusion and thank you for your reply =)
----- Original Message -----
From: "chuck rouillard" <chuckr at nanosecond.org>
To: "San Diego BUG" <sdbug at sdbug.org>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SDBUG] bandwidth withdrawls
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Joseph Kitzman wrote:
> > So my plee for help. my only other choice is richochet. Sure it
> > has some latency, but is far better than dialup.. I need to find a good
> > deal on ricochet, does anyone know of any providers that have any deals
> > going? What would be even cooler is if anyone knows a ricochet beta
> > that didnt opt to continue service, and would consider selling their
> > device.. well, if you know anyone in that situation, please tell them
> > drop some cash for the device.. as long as it can be reactivated without
> > much trouble.
> I have a Covad 1.5Mb/384kb static IP connection--I'm dumping
> them and keeping my cable connection. The DSL connection is
> reasonable (performance), but expensive. Read on...
> I'm confused here. Why would your only alternative be richochet?
> For that matter, since you're moving to Mira Mesa, why not cable
> modem? Even if you don't usually subscribe to cable television,
> it's a pretty good deal. From what I hear, Time Warner/RoadRunner
> (which is the cable co in Mira Mesa) has a new deal where you can
> install yourself--you save $$ here--they connect you up on their
> end only. They also won't take 6 to 7 weeks to connect you up
> and they are month-to-month.. no year-long lease. Two additional
> o You won't get a static IP, but then from what I hear of
> Covad, they don't offer static IPs either (unless you get
> one from an ISP that uses Covad as a DSL provider).
> I note that my two cable IPs haven't changed in over a year.
> o In my speed/performance testing, I checked the overall ftp
> transfer rates of Cable (RoadRunner in the PQ area) versus
> both 384/128kb and 1.5Mb/384kb. Cable (at least here), was
> almost exactly on par with DSL 1.5Mb/384kb from a varied
> assortment of ftp sites both around the U.S. and a few
> places afar.
> Chuck Rouillard ___ _______ __ ____ ______ / /
> chuckr at nanosecond.org / _ )/ __/ _ \ / // / |/ / \ \/ /
> chuckr at qnc.org / _ |\ \/ // /*/ // / / / \ \
> --SD BSD User Group-- /____/___/____/ /____/_/|_/_/ / /\__\
> www.sdbug.org *The Superior Alternative* /_/
> San Diego's BSD Users Group
> SDBUG at sdbug.org
More information about the SDBUG
More information about M5 Hosting